Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Words at Play: Benchmarking Audio Pun Understanding in Large Audio-Language Models

Yuchen Su, Shaoxin Zhong, Yonghua Zhu, Ruofan Wang, Zijian Huang, Qiqi Wang, Na Zhao, Diana Benavides-Prado, Michael Witbrock · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding. Within pun research, audio plays a central role in human communication except text and images, while datasets and systematic resources for spoken puns remain scarce, leaving this crucial modality largely underexplored. In this paper, we present APUN-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating large audio language models (LALMs) on audio pun understanding. Our benchmark contains 4,434 audio samples annotated across three stages: pun recognition, pun word location and pun meaning inference. We conduct a deep analysis of APUN-Bench by systematically evaluating 10 state-of-the-art LALMs, uncovering substantial performance gaps in recognizing, localizing, and interpreting audio puns. This analysis reveals key challenges, such as positional biases in audio pun location and error cases in meaning inference, offering actionable insights for advancing humour-aware audio intelligence.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 25%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

Apun Bench

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"In this paper, we present APUN-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating large audio language models (LALMs) on audio pun understanding."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Apun-Bench

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Puns represent a typical linguistic phenomenon that exploits polysemy and phonetic ambiguity to generate humour, posing unique challenges for natural language understanding.
  • Within pun research, audio plays a central role in human communication except text and images, while datasets and systematic resources for spoken puns remain scarce, leaving this crucial modality largely underexplored.
  • In this paper, we present APUN-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating large audio language models (LALMs) on audio pun understanding.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Within pun research, audio plays a central role in human communication except text and images, while datasets and systematic resources for spoken puns remain scarce, leaving this crucial modality largely underexplored.
  • In this paper, we present APUN-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating large audio language models (LALMs) on audio pun understanding.
  • Our benchmark contains 4,434 audio samples annotated across three stages: pun recognition, pun word location and pun meaning inference.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Within pun research, audio plays a central role in human communication except text and images, while datasets and systematic resources for spoken puns remain scarce, leaving this crucial modality largely underexplored.
  • In this paper, we present APUN-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating large audio language models (LALMs) on audio pun understanding.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Apun-Bench

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.