Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Semantic Reranking at Inference Time for Hard Examples in Rhetorical Role Labeling

Anas Belfathi, Nicolas Hernandez, Laura Monceaux, Warren Bonnard, Richard Dufour · May 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains. While language models (LMs) achieve strong average performance, they remain unreliable on hard examples, where prediction confidence is low. Existing approaches typically handle uncertainty implicitly and treat labels as discrete identifiers, overlooking the semantic information encoded in label names. We introduce RISE, an inference-time semantic reranking framework that leverages label semantics to refine predictions on hard instances. RISE automatically identifies low-confidence predictions and reranks model outputs using contrastively learned label representations, without retraining or modifying the underlying model. Experiments on eight domain-specific RRL datasets with seven LMs, including encoder-based and causal architectures, show an average gain of +9.15 macro-F1 points on hard examples. For explainability, we further propose manual hardness annotations to study difficulty from both model and human perspectives, revealing a moderate agreement with Cohen's kappa = 0.40.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

F1, Agreement / Kappa

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: F1, Agreement / Kappa
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) assigns a functional role to each sentence in a document and is widely used in legal, medical, and scientific domains.
  • While language models (LMs) achieve strong average performance, they remain unreliable on hard examples, where prediction confidence is low.
  • Existing approaches typically handle uncertainty implicitly and treat labels as discrete identifiers, overlooking the semantic information encoded in label names.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.