HiRO-Nav: Hybrid ReasOning Enables Efficient Embodied Navigation

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Abstract

Embodied navigation agents built upon large reasoning models (LRMs) can handle complex, multimodal environmental input and perform grounded reasoning per step to improve sequential decision-making for long-horizon tasks. However, a critical question remains: \textit{how can the reasoning capabilities of LRMs be harnessed intelligently and efficiently for long-horizon navigation tasks?} In simple scenes, agents are expected to act reflexively, while in complex ones they should engage in deliberate reasoning before acting.To achieve this, we introduce \textbf{H}ybr\textbf{i}d \textbf{R}eas\textbf{O}ning \textbf{Nav}igation (\textbf{HiRO-Nav}) agent, the first kind of agent capable of adaptively determining whether to perform thinking at every step based on its own action entropy. Specifically, by examining how the agent's action entropy evolves over the navigation trajectories, we observed that only a small fraction of actions exhibit high entropy, and these actions often steer the agent toward novel scenes or critical objects. Furthermore, studying the relationship between action entropy and task completion (i.e., Q-value) reveals that improving high-entropy actions contributes more positively to task success.Hence, we propose a tailored training pipeline comprising hybrid supervised fine-tuning as a cold start, followed by online reinforcement learning with the proposed hybrid reasoning strategy to explicitly activate reasoning only for high-entropy actions, significantly reducing computational overhead while improving decision quality. Extensive experiments on the \textsc{CHORES}-$\mathbb{S}$ ObjectNav benchmark showcases that HiRO-Nav achieves a better trade-off between success rates and token efficiency than both dense-thinking and no-thinking baselines.