Ruyi2.5 Technical Report

Huan Song, Shuyu Tian, Qingfei Zhao, Wenhao Hong, Jiang Liu, Ting Long, Jiawei Shao, Xuelong Li · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

We present Ruyi2.5, a multimodal familial model built on the AI Flow framework. Extending Ruyi2's "Train Once, Deploy Many" paradigm to the multimodal domain, Ruyi2.5 constructs a shared-backbone architecture that co-trains models of varying scales within a single unified pipeline, ensuring semantic consistency across all deployment tiers. Built upon Ruyi2.5, Ruyi2.5-Camera model is developed as a privacy-preserving camera service system, which instantiates Ruyi2.5-Camera into a two-stage recognition pipeline: an edge model applies information-bottleneck-guided irreversible feature mapping to de-identify raw frames at the source, while a cloud model performs deep behavior reasoning. To accelerate reinforcement learning fine-tuning, we further propose Binary Prefix Policy Optimization (BPPO), which reduces sample redundancy via binary response selection and focuses gradient updates on response prefixes, achieving a 2 to 3 times training speedup over GRPO. Experiments show Ruyi2.5 matches Qwen3-VL on the general multimodal benchmarks, while Ruyi2.5-Camera substantially outperforms Qwen3-VL on privacy-constrained surveillance tasks.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.