Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Why Are We Lonely? Leveraging LLMs to Measure and Understand Loneliness in Caregivers and Non-caregivers

Michelle Damin Kim, Ellie S. Paek, Yufen Lin, Emily Mroz, Jane Chung, Jinho D. Choi · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations. We introduce an expert-developed loneliness evaluation framework and an expert-informed typology for categorizing causes of loneliness for analyzing social media text. Using a human-validated data processing pipeline, we apply GPT-4o, GPT-5-nano, and GPT-5 to build a high-quality Reddit corpus and analyze loneliness across both populations. The loneliness evaluation framework achieved average accuracies of 76.09% and 79.78% for caregivers and non-caregivers, respectively. The cause categorization framework achieved micro-aggregate F1 scores of 0.825 and 0.80 for caregivers and non-caregivers, respectively. Across populations, we observe substantial differences in the distribution of types of causes of loneliness. Caregivers' loneliness were predominantly linked to caregiving roles, identity recognition, and feelings of abandonment, indicating distinct loneliness experiences between the two groups. Demographic extraction further demonstrates the viability of Reddit for building a diverse caregiver loneliness dataset. Overall, this work establishes an LLM-based pipeline for creating high quality social media datasets for studying loneliness and demonstrates its effectiveness in analyzing population-level differences in the manifestation of loneliness.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

Expert verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

F1

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"We introduce an expert-developed loneliness evaluation framework and an expert-informed typology for categorizing causes of loneliness for analyzing social media text."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: F1
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for constructing diverse social media datasets to measure and compare loneliness in the caregiver and non-caregiver populations.
  • We introduce an expert-developed loneliness evaluation framework and an expert-informed typology for categorizing causes of loneliness for analyzing social media text.
  • Using a human-validated data processing pipeline, we apply GPT-4o, GPT-5-nano, and GPT-5 to build a high-quality Reddit corpus and analyze loneliness across both populations.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.