Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Unified Optimization of Source Weights and Transfer Quantities in Multi-Source Transfer Learning: An Asymptotic Framework

Qingyue Zhang, Chang Chu, Haohao Fu, Tianren Peng, Yanru Wu, Guanbo Huang, Yang Li, Shao-Lun Huang · Jan 15, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks. However, existing multi-source methods typically focus on optimizing either the source weights or the amount of transferred samples, largely neglecting their joint consideration. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework, Unified Optimization of Weights and Quantities (UOWQ), that jointly determines the optimal source weights and transfer quantities for each source task. Specifically, the framework formulates multi-source transfer learning as a parameter estimation problem based on an asymptotic analysis of a Kullback--Leibler divergence--based generalization error measure, leading to two main theoretical findings: 1) using all available source samples is always optimal when the weights are properly adjusted; 2) the optimal source weights are characterized by a principled optimization problem whose structure explicitly incorporates the Fisher information, parameter discrepancy, parameter dimensionality, and transfer quantities. Building on the theoretical results, we further propose a practical algorithm for multi-source transfer learning, and extend it to multi-task learning settings where each task simultaneously serves as both a source and a target. Extensive experiments on real-world benchmarks, including DomainNet and Office-Home, demonstrate that UOWQ consistently outperforms strong baselines. The results validate both the theoretical predictions and the practical effectiveness of our framework.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks.
  • However, existing multi-source methods typically focus on optimizing either the source weights or the amount of transferred samples, largely neglecting their joint consideration.
  • In this work, we propose a theoretical framework, Unified Optimization of Weights and Quantities (UOWQ), that jointly determines the optimal source weights and transfer quantities for each source task.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.