Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Junjie Huang, Jiarui Qin, Di Yin, Weiwen Liu +3 more
Published
Aug 31, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Domain Experts
Signals refreshed
Aug 31, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities. Unlike the verifiable domains such as coding or mathematics, scaling trajectory data for open-ended tasks is much more difficult because these tasks lack singular ground truth and are costly to annotate or verify. In this paper, we propose RetroGen, a self-improving framework of retrospective process supervision. Our key observation is that although expert trajectories are scarce, high-quality final artifacts such as literature reviews, analyst reports and legal judgments, are abundant in pre-training data and can be viewed as compressed traces of the evidence-seeking processes that produced them. RetroGen reconstructs candidate latent trajectories from expert artifacts, verifies them against both the artifact and supporting evidence, and trains models on their own successful reconstruction data, without requiring trajectory data from stronger models. Experiments show that RetroGen improves grounding, faithful synthesis, and long-form evidence-seeking agent tasks.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities."
Domain Experts
Helpful for staffing comparability.
"Our key observation is that although expert trajectories are scarce, high-quality final artifacts such as literature reviews, analyst reports and legal judgments, are abundant in pre-training data and can be viewed as compressed traces of the evidence-seeking processes that produced them."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Trajectory data is getting more vital for training large language models for boosting the agentic abilities.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.