Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments

Evangelia Christakopoulou, Vivekkumar Patel, Hemanth Velaga, Sandip Gaikwad · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for. To maximize relevance, we leverage two complementary objectives: behavioral relevance (results users tend to click or download) and textual relevance (a result's semantic fit to the query). A persistent challenge is the scarcity of expert-provided textual relevance labels relative to abundant behavioral relevance labels. We first address this by systematically evaluating LLM configurations, finding that a specialized, fine-tuned model significantly outperforms a much larger pre-trained one in providing highly relevant labels. Using this optimal model as a force multiplier, we generate millions of textual relevance labels to overcome the data scarcity. We show that augmenting our production ranker with these textual relevance labels leads to a significant outward shift of the Pareto frontier: offline NDCG improves for behavioral relevance while simultaneously increasing for textual relevance. These offline gains were validated by a worldwide A/B test on the App Store ranker, which demonstrated a statistically significant +0.24% increase in conversion rate, with the most substantial performance gains occurring in tail queries, where the new textual relevance labels provide a robust signal in the absence of reliable behavioral relevance labels.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

Expert verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"A persistent challenge is the scarcity of expert-provided textual relevance labels relative to abundant behavioral relevance labels."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for.
  • To maximize relevance, we leverage two complementary objectives: behavioral relevance (results users tend to click or download) and textual relevance (a result's semantic fit to the query).
  • A persistent challenge is the scarcity of expert-provided textual relevance labels relative to abundant behavioral relevance labels.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.