STARS: Synchronous Token Alignment for Robust Supervision in Large Language Models

Mohammad Atif Quamar, Mohammad Areeb, Mikhail Kuznetsov, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Z. Berkay Celik · Nov 5, 2025 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values is crucial for safe deployment. Inference-time techniques offer granular control over generation; however, they rely on model uncertainty, meaning an internal estimate of how likely the model believes its next tokens or outputs are correct, for segmentation. We show that this introduces two critical limitations: (a) vulnerability to miscalibrated confident hallucinations and (b) poor hardware utilization due to asynchronous, ragged batch processing. Together, these issues reduce alignment reliability while increasing token and compute costs, which limits their practical scalability. To address these limitations, building on dynamic inference-time alignment methods, we introduce STARS, Synchronous Token Alignment for Robust Supervision, a decoding-time algorithm, which steers generation by enforcing verification at fixed-horizon intervals. By decoupling segmentation from confidence, STARS enables lockstep parallel execution and robustly detects errors that uncertainty metrics miss. On the HH-RLHF benchmark, we demonstrate that STARS achieves competitive alignment quality with that of state-of-the-art dynamic methods, while strictly bounding rejection costs and maximizing system throughput. Furthermore, it outperforms fine-tuning and several state-of-the-art inference-time decoding strategies by good margins, and establishes fixed-horizon sampling as a robust, system-efficient alternative for aligning LLMs at scale. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/purseclab/STARS.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.