Evaluating Spoken Language as a Biomarker for Automated Screening of Cognitive Impairment

Maria R. Lima, Alexander Capstick, Fatemeh Geranmayeh, Ramin Nilforooshan, Maja Matarić, Ravi Vaidyanathan, Payam Barnaghi · Jan 30, 2025 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics

Open arXiv Open DOI Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Timely and accurate assessment of cognitive impairment remains a major unmet need. Speech biomarkers offer a scalable, non-invasive, cost-effective solution for automated screening. However, the clinical utility of machine learning (ML) remains limited by interpretability and generalisability to real-world speech datasets. We evaluate explainable ML for screening of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and severity prediction using benchmark DementiaBank speech (N = 291, 64% female, 69.8 (SD = 8.6) years). We validate generalisability on pilot data collected in-residence (N = 22, 59% female, 76.2 (SD = 8.0) years). To enhance clinical utility, we stratify risk for actionable triage and assess linguistic feature importance. We show that a Random Forest trained on linguistic features for ADRD detection achieves a mean sensitivity of 69.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 66.4-72.5) and specificity of 83.3% (78.0-88.7). On pilot data, this model yields a mean sensitivity of 70.0% (58.0-82.0) and specificity of 52.5% (39.3-65.7). For prediction of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, a Random Forest Regressor achieves a mean absolute MMSE error of 3.7 (3.7-3.8), with comparable performance of 3.3 (3.1-3.5) on pilot data. Risk stratification improves specificity by 13% on the test set, offering a pathway for clinical triage. Linguistic features associated with ADRD include increased use of pronouns and adverbs, greater disfluency, reduced analytical thinking, lower lexical diversity, and fewer words that reflect a psychological state of completion. Our predictive modelling shows promise for integration with conversational technology at home to monitor cognitive health and triage higher-risk individuals, enabling early screening and intervention.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.