Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems

Yilun Zhao, Jinbiao Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang +2 more

Published

May 5, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

15/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Domain Experts

Signals refreshed

May 5, 2026

Open arXiv Find implementation Shortlist (0) RSS feed

Tags

Automatic Metrics

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Validate the exact study setup in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
15/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here

Human Eval Papers LLM-as-Judge Papers Pairwise Preference Papers Tool-Use Evaluation Search

Abstract

Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity. This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis. However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather than evidence portfolio construction. We introduce BRIGHT-Pro, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols. We further construct RTriever-Synth, an aspect-decomposed synthetic corpus that generates complementary positives and positive-conditioned hard negatives, and use it to LoRA fine-tune RTriever-4B from Qwen3-Embedding-4B. Experiments across lexical, general-purpose, and reasoning-intensive retrievers show that aspect-aware and agentic evaluation expose behaviors hidden by standard metrics, while RTriever-4B substantially improves over its base model.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity."

Quality Controls

partial

Gold Questions

Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.

"Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity."

Reported Metrics

partial

Relevance

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather than evidence portfolio construction."

Rater Population

partial

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"We introduce BRIGHT-Pro, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

relevance
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Domain Experts
Expertise required
General
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Gold Questions
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity.
  • This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis.
  • However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather than evidence portfolio construction.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Expert verification evaluation

Contribution summary

  • This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis.
  • However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather…
  • We introduce BRIGHT-Pro, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols.

Why it matters for eval

  • This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis.
  • We introduce BRIGHT-Pro, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    Detected: Gold Questions

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: relevance