AudioTrust: Benchmarking the Multifaceted Trustworthiness of Audio Large Language Models

Kai Li, Can Shen, Yile Liu, Jirui Han, Kelong Zheng, Xuechao Zou, Lionel Z. Wang, Shun Zhang, Xingjian Du, Hanjun Luo, Yingbin Jin, Xinxin Xing, Ziyang Ma, Yue Liu, Yifan Zhang, Junfeng Fang, Kun Wang, Yibo Yan, Gelei Deng, Haoyang Li, Yiming Li, Xiaobin Zhuang, Tianlong Chen, Qingsong Wen, Tianwei Zhang, Yang Liu, Haibo Hu, Zhizheng Wu, Xiaolin Hu, Eng-Siong Chng, Wenyuan Xu, XiaoFeng Wang, Wei Dong, Xinfeng Li · May 22, 2025 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

The rapid development and widespread adoption of Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) demand rigorous evaluation of their trustworthiness. However, existing evaluation frameworks are primarily designed for text and fail to capture vulnerabilities introduced by the acoustic properties of audio. We find that significant trustworthiness risks in ALLMs arise from non-semantic acoustic cues, such as timbre, accent, and background noise, which can be exploited to manipulate model behavior. To address this gap, we propose AudioTrust, the first large-scale and systematic framework for evaluating ALLM trustworthiness under audio-specific risks. AudioTrust covers six key dimensions: fairness, hallucination, safety, privacy, robustness, and authenticition. It includes 26 sub-tasks and a curated dataset of more than 4,420 audio samples collected from real-world scenarios, including daily conversations, emergency calls, and voice assistant interactions, and is specifically designed to probe trustworthiness across multiple dimensions. Our comprehensive evaluation spans 18 experimental settings and uses human-validated automated pipelines to enable objective and scalable assessment of model outputs. Experimental results on 14 state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source ALLMs reveal important limitations and failure boundaries under diverse high-risk audio scenarios, providing critical insights for the secure and trustworthy deployment of future audio models. Our platform and benchmark are publicly available at https://github.com/JusperLee/AudioTrust.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.