Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

GenDB: The Next Generation of Query Processing -- Synthesized, Not Engineered

Jiale Lao, Immanuel Trummer

Published

Mar 2, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

15/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Domain Experts

Signals refreshed

Mar 2, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
15/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts. However, new techniques and user requirements evolve rapidly, and existing systems often cannot keep pace. At the same time, these systems are difficult to extend due to their internal complexity, and developing new systems requires substantial engineering effort and cost. In this paper, we argue that recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) are starting to shape the next generation of query processing systems. We propose using LLMs to synthesize execution code for each incoming query, instead of continuously building, extending, and maintaining complex query processing engines. As a proof of concept, we present GenDB, an LLM-powered agentic system that generates instance-optimized and customized query execution code tailored to specific data, workloads, and hardware resources. We implemented an early prototype of GenDB that uses Claude Code Agent as the underlying component in the multi-agent system, and we evaluate it on OLAP workloads. We use queries from the well-known TPC-H benchmark and also construct a new benchmark designed to reduce potential data leakage from LLM training data. We compare GenDB with state-of-the-art query engines, including DuckDB, Umbra, MonetDB, ClickHouse, and PostgreSQL. GenDB achieves significantly better performance than these systems. Finally, we discuss the current limitations of GenDB and outline future extensions and related research challenges.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Rater Population

partial

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Domain Experts
Expertise required
Math, Coding
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
Multi Agent
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Traditional query processing relies on engines that are carefully optimized and engineered by many experts.
  • However, new techniques and user requirements evolve rapidly, and existing systems often cannot keep pace.
  • At the same time, these systems are difficult to extend due to their internal complexity, and developing new systems requires substantial engineering effort and cost.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • We propose using LLMs to synthesize execution code for each incoming query, instead of continuously building, extending, and maintaining complex query processing engines.
  • As a proof of concept, we present GenDB, an LLM-powered agentic system that generates instance-optimized and customized query execution code tailored to specific data, workloads, and hardware resources.
  • We implemented an early prototype of GenDB that uses Claude Code Agent as the underlying component in the multi-agent system, and we evaluate it on OLAP workloads.

Why it matters for eval

  • As a proof of concept, we present GenDB, an LLM-powered agentic system that generates instance-optimized and customized query execution code tailored to specific data, workloads, and hardware resources.
  • We implemented an early prototype of GenDB that uses Claude Code Agent as the underlying component in the multi-agent system, and we evaluate it on OLAP workloads.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.