Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

SkillRet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Skill Retrieval in LLM Agents

Hongcheol Cho, Ryangkyung Kang, Youngeun Kim

Published

May 7, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

5/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Aug 31, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
5/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge. In small libraries, users may invoke skills explicitly by name, but this assumption breaks down as skill ecosystems grow under tight context and latency budgets. Despite its practical importance, skill retrieval remains underexplored, with limited benchmarks and little understanding of retrieval behavior on realistic skill libraries. To address this gap, we introduce SkillRet, a large-scale benchmark for skill retrieval in LLM agents. SkillRet contains 16,129 public agent skills, organized with structured semantic tags and a two-level taxonomy spanning 6 major categories and 18 sub-categories. It provides 63,259 training samples and 4,392 evaluation queries with disjoint skill pools, enabling both benchmarking and retrieval-oriented training. Across a diverse set of retrievers, we find that skill retrieval remains far from solved: off-the-shelf models struggle on realistic large-scale skill libraries, and prior skill-retrieval models still leave substantial headroom. Task-specific fine-tuning on SkillRet improves NDCG@10 by 12.9 points over the strongest prior retriever and by 16.2 points over the strongest off-the-shelf retriever. Our analysis further suggests that these gains arise because fine-tuned models better focus on the small skill-relevant signals within long and noisy queries. These results establish SkillRet as a strong benchmark and foundation for future research on retrieval in large-scale agent systems. We publicly release the benchmark (https://huggingface.co/datasets/ThakiCloud/SKILLRET), code (https://github.com/ThakiCloud/SKILLRET), and model checkpoints (0.6B: https://huggingface.co/ThakiCloud/SKILLRET-Embedding-0.6B; 8B: https://huggingface.co/ThakiCloud/SKILLRET-Embedding-8B).

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

Skill Retrieval

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Across a diverse set of retrievers, we find that skill retrieval remains far from solved: off-the-shelf models struggle on realistic large-scale skill libraries, and prior skill-retrieval models still leave substantial headroom."

Reported Metrics

partial

Ndcg

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Task-specific fine-tuning on SkillRet improves NDCG@10 by 12.9 points over the strongest prior retriever and by 16.2 points over the strongest off-the-shelf retriever."

Benchmarks and datasets

skill-retrieval

Reported metrics

ndcg
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Expertise required
Coding
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge.
  • In small libraries, users may invoke skills explicitly by name, but this assumption breaks down as skill ecosystems grow under tight context and latency budgets.
  • Despite its practical importance, skill retrieval remains underexplored, with limited benchmarks and little understanding of retrieval behavior on realistic skill libraries.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge.
  • Despite its practical importance, skill retrieval remains underexplored, with limited benchmarks and little understanding of retrieval behavior on realistic skill libraries.
  • To address this gap, we introduce SkillRet, a large-scale benchmark for skill retrieval in LLM agents.

Why it matters for eval

  • As LLM agents are increasingly deployed with large libraries of reusable skills, selecting the right skill for a user request has become a critical systems challenge.
  • To address this gap, we introduce SkillRet, a large-scale benchmark for skill retrieval in LLM agents.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: skill-retrieval

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: ndcg