Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Retrieval-Augmented LLM Agents: Learning to Learn from Experience

Thomas Palmeira Ferraz, Romain Deffayet, Vassilina Nikoulina, Hervé Déjean, Stéphane Clinchant · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge. Current approaches typically rely on either fine-tuning or training-free memory-augmented generation using retrieved experience; yet both have limitations: fine-tuning often fails to extrapolate to new tasks, while experience retrieval often underperforms compared to supervised baselines. In this work, we propose to combine these approaches and systematically study how to train retrieval-augmented LLM agents to effectively leverage retrieved trajectories in-context. First, we establish a robust supervised fine-tuning (SFT) recipe using LoRA that outperforms several state-of-the-art agent training pipelines. Second, we provide a detailed analysis of key design choices for experience retrieval, identifying optimal strategies for storage, querying, and trajectory selection. Finally, we propose a pipeline that integrates experience retrieval into the fine-tuning process. Our results demonstrate that this combined approach significantly improves generalization to unseen tasks, providing a scalable and effective framework for building agents that learn to learn from experience.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Unit of annotation: Trajectory (inferred)
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge.
  • Current approaches typically rely on either fine-tuning or training-free memory-augmented generation using retrieved experience; yet both have limitations: fine-tuning often fails to extrapolate to new tasks, while experience retrieval often underperforms compared to supervised baselines.
  • In this work, we propose to combine these approaches and systematically study how to train retrieval-augmented LLM agents to effectively leverage retrieved trajectories in-context.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge.
  • In this work, we propose to combine these approaches and systematically study how to train retrieval-augmented LLM agents to effectively leverage retrieved trajectories in-context.
  • Finally, we propose a pipeline that integrates experience retrieval into the fine-tuning process.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, achieving robust generalization to unseen tasks remains a significant challenge.
  • In this work, we propose to combine these approaches and systematically study how to train retrieval-augmented LLM agents to effectively leverage retrieved trajectories in-context.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.