ParetoBandit: Budget-Paced Adaptive Routing for Non-Stationary LLM Serving

Annette Taberner-Miller · Mar 31, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Production LLM serving often relies on multi-model portfolios spanning a ~530x cost range, where routing decisions trade off quality against cost. This trade-off is non-stationary: providers revise pricing, model quality can regress silently, and new models must be integrated without downtime. We present ParetoBandit, an open-source adaptive router built on cost-aware contextual bandits that is the first to simultaneously enforce dollar-denominated budgets, adapt online to such shifts, and onboard new models at runtime. ParetoBandit closes these gaps through three mechanisms. An online primal-dual budget pacer enforces a per-request cost ceiling over an open-ended stream, replacing offline penalty tuning with closed-loop control. Geometric forgetting on sufficient statistics enables rapid adaptation to price and quality shifts while bootstrapping from offline priors. A hot-swap registry lets operators add or remove models at runtime, with a brief forced-exploration phase for each newcomer, after which UCB selection discovers its quality-cost niche from live traffic alone. We evaluate ParetoBandit across four deployment scenarios on 1,824 prompts routed through a three-model portfolio. Across seven budget ceilings, mean per-request cost never exceeds the target by more than 0.4%. When conditions shift, the system adapts: an order-of-magnitude price cut on the costliest model yields up to +0.071 quality lift, and a silent quality regression is detected and rerouted within budget. A cold-started model reaches meaningful adoption within ~142 steps without breaching the cost ceiling. The router discriminates rather than blindly adopting: expensive models are budget-gated and low-quality models rejected after bounded exploration. End-to-end routing latency is 9.8ms on CPU -- less than 0.4% of typical inference time -- with the routing decision itself taking just 22.5us.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.