Skip to content
← Back to explorer

WeNLEX: Weakly Supervised Natural Language Explanations for Multilabel Chest X-ray Classification

Isabel Rio-Torto, Jaime S. Cardoso, Luís F. Teixeira · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Stale

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Stale

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Stale

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports. Most works explicitly supervise the explanation generation process using datasets annotated with explanations. Thus, though plausible, the generated explanations are not faithful to the model's reasoning. In this work, we propose WeNLEX, a weakly supervised model for the generation of natural language explanations for multilabel chest X-ray classification. Faithfulness is ensured by matching images generated from their corresponding natural language explanations with original images, in the black-box model's feature space. Plausibility is maintained via distribution alignment with a small database of clinician-annotated explanations. We empirically demonstrate, through extensive validation on multiple metrics to assess faithfulness, simulatability, diversity, and plausibility, that WeNLEX is able to produce faithful and plausible explanations, using as little as 5 ground-truth explanations per diagnosis. Furthermore, WeNLEX can operate in both post-hoc and in-model settings. In the latter, i.e., when the multilabel classifier is trained together with the rest of the network, WeNLEX improves the classification AUC of the standalone classifier by 2.21%, thus showing that adding interpretability to the training process can actually increase the downstream task performance. Additionally, simply by changing the database, WeNLEX explanations are adaptable to any target audience, and we showcase this flexibility by training a layman version of WeNLEX, where explanations are simplified for non-medical users.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Human Data Lens

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Natural language explanations provide an inherently human-understandable way to explain black-box models, closely reflecting how radiologists convey their diagnoses in textual reports.
  • Most works explicitly supervise the explanation generation process using datasets annotated with explanations.
  • Thus, though plausible, the generated explanations are not faithful to the model's reasoning.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.