Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Maximilian Idahl, Jörg Tiedemann, Sampo Pyysalo, David Salinas +18 more
Published
Jul 1, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
30% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Jul 1, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development. We introduce MultiSynt/MT, an open synthetic parallel corpus with approximately 4.8 trillion target-language tokens across 36 European languages, produced by translating 100 billion high-quality Nemotron-CC tokens with Tower+ and OPUS-MT/HPLT-MT systems. For many medium- and lower-resource European languages, this is the largest openly available pre-training resource. On a broad multilingual benchmark suite, reference LLMs trained on MultiSynt/MT reach the final score of HPLT 2.0, a native-data baseline, using roughly 72% fewer pre-training tokens, and outperform it by approximately 15% relative at a matched 100B-token training budget. Our analyses also identify evaluation blind spots: standard multiple-choice benchmarks miss translation-quality differences that a fluency-sensitive LLM-as-judge evaluation cleanly recovers on the trained LLMs (with no fluency deficit in MultiSynt itself), and Norwegian idiomatic and culturally grounded tasks remain better served by native data. We release the corpus, including row-aligned translations from multiple systems, to support controlled research on multilingual pre-training data and evaluation.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
Llm As Judge
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Open web-scale pre-training corpora remain concentrated in English, limiting multilingual LLM development.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Llm As Judge
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.