Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

DocVAL: Validated Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Grounded Document VQA

Ahmad Mohammadshirazi, Pinaki Prasad Guha Neogi, Ser-Nam Lim, Rajiv Ramnath · Nov 27, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts. While large vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong spatial grounding, their inference cost and latency limit real-world deployment. Compact VLMs are more efficient, but they often suffer substantial localization degradation under standard fine-tuning or distillation. To address this gap, we propose DocVAL, a validated chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation framework that transfers explicit spatial reasoning from large teacher models to compact, deployable student VLMs. DocVAL combines (1) teacher-generated spatial CoT supervision, (2) a rule-based dual-mode validator that filters low-quality training signals and provides fine-grained, pixel-level corrective feedback, and (3) a validation-driven two-stage training procedure with iterative refinement. Text detection is used only as training-time scaffolding for supervision and validation, enabling the final student to operate as a pure VLM without OCR or detection at inference. Across multiple document understanding benchmarks, DocVAL yields consistent improvements of up to 6-7 ANLS points over comparable compact VLMs. We further introduce mean Average Precision (mAP) as a localization metric for document question answering and report strong spatial grounding performance under this new evaluation. We release 95K validator-verified CoT traces and show that high-quality, validated supervision is more effective than scaling unfiltered data, enabling efficient and trustworthy document grounding. Dataset and implementation: https://github.com/ahmad-shirazi/DocVAL

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Document visual question answering requires models not only to answer questions correctly, but also to precisely localize answers within complex document layouts.
  • While large vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong spatial grounding, their inference cost and latency limit real-world deployment.
  • Compact VLMs are more efficient, but they often suffer substantial localization degradation under standard fine-tuning or distillation.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.