Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)Pairwise preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Qiang He, Yucheng Yang, Tianyi Zhou, Meng Fang +2 more
Published
Apr 6, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
Apr 6, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc. Current reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) mainly focuses on a fixed reward learned from average human ratings, which may weaken the adaptability and controllability of varying preferences. However, creating personalized LLMs requires aligning LLMs with individual human preferences, which is non-trivial due to the scarce data per user and the diversity of user preferences in multi-objective trade-offs, varying from emphasizing empathy in certain contexts to demanding efficiency and precision in others. Can we train one LLM to produce personalized outputs across different user preferences on the Pareto front? In this paper, we introduce Multi-Objective Control (MOC), which trains a single LLM to directly generate responses in the preference-defined regions of the Pareto front. Our approach introduces multi-objective optimization (MOO) principles into RLHF to train an LLM as a preference-conditioned policy network. We improve the computational efficiency of MOC by applying MOO at the policy level, enabling us to fine-tune a 7B-parameter model on a single A6000 GPU. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advantages of MOC over baselines in three aspects: (i) controllability of LLM outputs w.r.t. user preferences on the trade-off among multiple rewards; (ii) quality and diversity of LLM outputs, measured by the hyper-volume of multiple solutions achieved; and (iii) generalization to unseen preferences. These results highlight MOC's potential for real-world applications requiring scalable and customizable LLMs.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Pairwise preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for enhancing LLMs' safety, helpfulness, humor, faithfulness, etc.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.