Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

ACC: Compiling Agent Trajectories for Long-Context Training

Qisheng Su, Zhen Fang, Shiting Huang, Yu Zeng, Yiming Zhao, Kou Shi, Ziao Zhang, Lin Chen, Zehui Chen, Lijun Wu, Feng Zhao · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs. However, training LLMs for this capacity requires costly long-document curation or heuristic context synthesis. We observe that agents produce massive trajectories when solving problems, invoking tools and receiving environment observations across many turns. The evidence needed to answer the original question is thus scattered throughout these turns, requiring integration of distant context segments. Nevertheless, standard agent SFT masks tool responses and only trains turn-level tool selection, creating a supervision blind spot where these scattered signals go unused. We propose Agent Context Compilation (ACC), which converts trajectories from search, software engineering, and database querying agents into long-context QA pairs that combine the original question with tool responses and environment observations gathered across multiple turns, training the model to answer directly without tool use. This makes the dependencies between the question and the evidence explicit, enabling direct supervision of long-context reasoning over distant segments without additional annotation. ACC is a simple but effective approach that can be combined with any existing long-context extension or training method, providing scalable supervised fine-tuning data. We validate ACC on long-range dependency modeling tasks through MRCR and GraphWalks, challenging benchmarks requiring cross-turn coreference resolution and graph traversal over extended contexts. Training Qwen3-30B-A3B with ACC achieves 68.3 on MRCR (+18.1) and 77.5 on GraphWalks (+7.6), results comparable to Qwen3-235B-A22B, while preserving general capabilities on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, AIME, and IFEval. Further mechanism analysis reveals that the ACC-trained model exhibits task-adaptive attention restructuring and expert specialization.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

Expert verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Simulation environment, Tool Use evaluation

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

MMLU

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Training Qwen3-30B-A3B with ACC achieves 68.3 on MRCR (+18.1) and 77.5 on GraphWalks (+7.6), results comparable to Qwen3-235B-A22B, while preserving general capabilities on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, AIME, and IFEval."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Further mechanism analysis reveals that the ACC-trained model exhibits task-adaptive attention restructuring and expert specialization."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: MMLU
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Simulation environment, Tool-use evaluation
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs.
  • However, training LLMs for this capacity requires costly long-document curation or heuristic context synthesis.
  • We observe that agents produce massive trajectories when solving problems, invoking tools and receiving environment observations across many turns.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against others mentioning MMLU.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Simulation environment, Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.