Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Cost-Efficient Multimodal LLM Inference via Cross-Tier GPU Heterogeneity

Donglin Yu · Mar 13, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 6:42 AM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 6:42 AM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound. We show that under standard transformer KV caching, the modality boundary (between vision encoder and language model) minimizes cross-device transfer among all partition points that preserve standard stage-based execution. Partitioning here reduces transfer complexity from $O(L * s_ctx)$ bytes (GB-scale KV caches under stage-level disaggregation) to $O(N_v * d)$ bytes (MB-scale embeddings), an O(L) reduction where L is the transformer depth. The result holds across attention mechanisms (MHA/GQA), dynamic vision resolutions, and model scales, and the advantage grows as models deepen. A direct implication is that existing stage-level disaggregation systems are constrained to high-bandwidth interconnects (e.g., NVLink), whereas modality-level disaggregation enables cross-tier heterogeneous serving over commodity PCIe. A closed-form cost model shows that heterogeneous deployment is cost-optimal under phase-separable workloads (predicts 31.4% savings; observed 40.6%). We build HeteroServe, a phase-aware runtime with modality-level partitioning and cross-tier scheduling, and evaluate it on LLaVA-1.5-7B and Qwen2.5-VL against vLLM v0.3.0. On identical 4xA100 hardware, engine optimizations raise throughput by up to 54%. Under a fixed budget, a heterogeneous cluster (\$38k) improves Tokens/\$ by 37% over a homogeneous baseline (\$64k) without degrading latency.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.

Generated Mar 13, 2026, 6:42 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Multimodal large language model (MLLM) inference splits into two phases with opposing hardware demands: vision encoding is compute-bound, while language generation is memory-bandwidth-bound.
  • We show that under standard transformer KV caching, the modality boundary (between vision encoder and language model) minimizes cross-device transfer among all partition points that preserve standard stage-based execution.
  • Partitioning here reduces transfer complexity from $O(L * s_ctx)$ bytes (GB-scale KV caches under stage-level disaggregation) to $O(N_v * d)$ bytes (MB-scale embeddings), an O(L) reduction where L is the transformer depth.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.