Skip to content
← Back to explorer

AD-Bench: A Real-World, Trajectory-Aware Advertising Analytics Benchmark for LLM Agents

Lingxiang Hu, Yiding Sun, Tianle Xia, Wenwei Li, Ming Xu, Liqun Liu, Peng Shu, Huan Yu, Jie Jiang · Feb 15, 2026 · Citations: 0

Abstract

While Large Language Model (LLM) agents have achieved remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks, evaluating their performance in real-world environments has become a critical problem. Current benchmarks, however, are largely restricted to idealized simulations, failing to address the practical demands of specialized domains like advertising and marketing analytics. In these fields, tasks are inherently more complex, often requiring multi-round interaction with professional marketing tools. To address this gap, we propose AD-Bench, a benchmark designed based on real-world business requirements of advertising and marketing platforms. AD-Bench is constructed from real user marketing analysis requests, with domain experts providing verifiable reference answers and corresponding reference tool-call trajectories. The benchmark categorizes requests into three difficulty levels (L1-L3) to evaluate agents' capabilities under multi-round, multi-tool collaboration. Experiments show that on AD-Bench, Gemini-3-Pro achieves Pass@1 = 68.0% and Pass@3 = 83.0%, but performance drops significantly on L3 to Pass@1 = 49.4% and Pass@3 = 62.1%, with a trajectory coverage of 70.1%, indicating that even state-of-the-art models still exhibit substantial capability gaps in complex advertising and marketing analysis scenarios. AD-Bench provides a realistic benchmark for evaluating and improving advertising marketing agents, the leaderboard and code can be found at https://github.com/Emanual20/adbench-leaderboard.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper has direct human-feedback and/or evaluation protocol signal and is likely useful for eval pipeline design.

Eval-Fit Score

67/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

HFEPX Fit

High-confidence candidate

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Expert Verification
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Unit of annotation: Trajectory
  • Expertise required: Coding
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes: Simulation Env
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.80
  • Flags: None

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Ad-Bench

Reported Metrics

pass@1pass@3

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

While Large Language Model (LLM) agents have achieved remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks, evaluating their performance in real-world environments has become a critical problem. HFEPX signals include Expert Verification, Simulation Env, Long Horizon with confidence 0.80. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Mar 3, 2026, 6:48 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • While Large Language Model (LLM) agents have achieved remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks, evaluating their performance in real-world environments has become a critical…
  • Current benchmarks, however, are largely restricted to idealized simulations, failing to address the practical demands of specialized domains like advertising and marketing…

Researcher Actions

  • Compare its human-feedback setup against pairwise and rubric hubs.
  • Cross-check benchmark overlap: Ad-Bench.
  • Validate metric comparability (pass@1, pass@3).

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Extraction confidence is probabilistic and should be validated for critical decisions.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • While Large Language Model (LLM) agents have achieved remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks, evaluating their performance in real-world environments has become a critical problem.
  • Current benchmarks, however, are largely restricted to idealized simulations, failing to address the practical demands of specialized domains like advertising and marketing analytics.
  • To address this gap, we propose AD-Bench, a benchmark designed based on real-world business requirements of advertising and marketing platforms.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • While Large Language Model (LLM) agents have achieved remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks, evaluating their performance in real-world environments has become a critical problem.
  • To address this gap, we propose AD-Bench, a benchmark designed based on real-world business requirements of advertising and marketing platforms.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Expert Verification

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Simulation Env

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Ad-Bench

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: pass@1, pass@3

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.