Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

InfoTok: Information-Theoretic Regularization for Capacity-Constrained Shared Visual Tokenization in Unified MLLMs

Lv Tang, Tianyi Zheng, Bo Li, Xingyu Li · Feb 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis. However, existing shared-token designs are largely architecture-driven and lack an explicit criterion for what information should be preserved to simultaneously support semantic abstraction and visual detail. In this paper, we adopt a capacity-constrained perspective, viewing the shared tokenizer as a compute-bounded learner whose finite representational budget should prioritize reusable structure over hard-to-exploit high-entropy variations and redundancy. Motivated by this view, we propose \textbf{\textit{InfoTok}}, an information-regularized tokenization mechanism grounded in the Information Bottleneck (IB) principle. InfoTok explicitly controls information flow from images to shared tokens to multimodal outputs by imposing mutual-information (MI) constraints that enforce a principled trade-off between compression and task relevance, while also encouraging cross-modal consistency. Because MI is intractable for high-dimensional visual representations, we instantiate InfoTok with practical, differentiable dependence estimators, including a variational IB formulation and a Hilbert Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) based alternative. Integrated into three representative unified MLLMs without introducing any additional training data, InfoTok consistently improves both image understanding and generation performance. These results support information-regularized visual tokenization as a sound basis for token learning in unified MLLMs.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.
  • However, existing shared-token designs are largely architecture-driven and lack an explicit criterion for what information should be preserved to simultaneously support semantic abstraction and visual detail.
  • In this paper, we adopt a capacity-constrained perspective, viewing the shared tokenizer as a compute-bounded learner whose finite representational budget should prioritize reusable structure over hard-to-exploit high-entropy variations and redundancy.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.