Skip to content
← Back to explorer

InfoTok: Information-Theoretic Regularization for Capacity-Constrained Shared Visual Tokenization in Unified MLLMs

Lv Tang, Tianyi Zheng, Bo Li, Xingyu Li · Feb 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

Data freshness

Extraction: Recent

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Apr 6, 2026, 3:39 AM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Apr 6, 2026, 3:39 AM

Recent

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis. However, existing shared-token designs are largely architecture-driven and lack an explicit criterion for what information should be preserved to simultaneously support semantic abstraction and visual detail. In this paper, we adopt a capacity-constrained perspective, viewing the shared tokenizer as a compute-bounded learner whose finite representational budget should prioritize reusable structure over hard-to-exploit high-entropy variations and redundancy. Motivated by this view, we propose \textbf{\textit{InfoTok}}, an information-regularized tokenization mechanism grounded in the Information Bottleneck (IB) principle. InfoTok explicitly controls information flow from images to shared tokens to multimodal outputs by imposing mutual-information (MI) constraints that enforce a principled trade-off between compression and task relevance, while also encouraging cross-modal consistency. Because MI is intractable for high-dimensional visual representations, we instantiate InfoTok with practical, differentiable dependence estimators, including a variational IB formulation and a Hilbert Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) based alternative. Integrated into three representative unified MLLMs without introducing any additional training data, InfoTok consistently improves both image understanding and generation performance. These results support information-regularized visual tokenization as a sound basis for token learning in unified MLLMs.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.
Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.

Generated Apr 6, 2026, 3:39 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aim to unify image understanding and image generation within a single framework, where a shared visual tokenizer serves as the sole interface that maps high-dimensional images into a limited token budget for downstream multimodal reasoning and synthesis.
  • However, existing shared-token designs are largely architecture-driven and lack an explicit criterion for what information should be preserved to simultaneously support semantic abstraction and visual detail.
  • In this paper, we adopt a capacity-constrained perspective, viewing the shared tokenizer as a compute-bounded learner whose finite representational budget should prioritize reusable structure over hard-to-exploit high-entropy variations and redundancy.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote