Skip to content
← Back to explorer

LP-GEMM: Integrating Layout Propagation into GEMM Operations

César Guedes Carneiro, Lucas Alvarenga, Guido Araujo, Sandro Rigo · Apr 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Recent

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Recent

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Recent

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time. While state-of-the-art BLAS libraries aggressively optimize individual GEMM calls, they remain constrained by the BLAS API, which requires each call to independently pack input matrices and restore outputs to a canonical memory layout. In sequential GEMMs, these constraints cause redundant packing and unpacking, wasting valuable computational resources. This paper introduces LP-GEMM, a decomposition of the GEMM kernel that enables packing-layout propagation across sequential GEMM operations. This approach eliminates unnecessary data repacking while preserving full BLAS semantic correctness at the boundaries. We evaluate LP-GEMM on x86 (AVX-512) and RISC-V (RVV 1.0) architectures across MLP-like and Attention-like workloads. Our results show average speedups of 2.25x over OpenBLAS on Intel x86 for sequential GEMMs and competitive gains relative to vendor-optimized libraries such as Intel MKL. We demonstrate the practicality of the approach beyond microbenchmarks by implementing a standalone C++ version of the Llama-3.2 inference path using exclusively BLAS-level GEMM calls. These results confirm that leveraging data layout propagation between operations can significantly boost performance.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Tool Use evaluation

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Human Data Lens

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Tool-use evaluation
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • In Scientific Computing and modern Machine Learning (ML) workloads, sequences of dependent General Matrix Multiplications (GEMMs) often dominate execution time.
  • While state-of-the-art BLAS libraries aggressively optimize individual GEMM calls, they remain constrained by the BLAS API, which requires each call to independently pack input matrices and restore outputs to a canonical memory layout.
  • In sequential GEMMs, these constraints cause redundant packing and unpacking, wasting valuable computational resources.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.