Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Inha Kang, Eunki Kim, Wonjeong Ryu, Jaeyo Shin +6 more
Published
Nov 27, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
25/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 23, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions. However, achieving reliable forecasts remains challenging in regions with complex terrain and strong atmospheric dynamics such as East Asia. While foundation models such as Aurora offer global generality, they often miss region-specific dynamics and rely on non-real-time inputs, limiting their practical utility for localized warning systems. To address this gap, we construct and release the real-world observations and high-resolution CMAQ-OBS dataset for East Asia, reducing regional error by 59.5% and enabling real-time 48-120 hour forecasts critical for public health alerts. However, standard point-wise objectives cannot reflect asymmetric operational costs, where false alarms deteriorate public trust while missed severe events endanger populations. This cost mismatch causes SFT models to over-predict and yield high False Alarm Rates. We introduce Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with class-wise rewards and curriculum rollout to align predictions with operational priorities. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework significantly improves the reliability of the forecast. Compared to the SFT-only baseline, our model reduces the False Alarm Rate by 47.3% while achieving a competitive F1-score, proving its effectiveness for practical, real-world air quality forecasting systems on long lead time scenarios. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/kaist-cvml/FAKER-Air.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
F1
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Accurate long horizon forecasting of particulate matter (PM) concentration fields is essential for operational public health decisions.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: f1