Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Ru Zhang, Weijie Qiu
Published
Jul 15, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Aug 20, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps. Existing reinforcement learning methods reduce trajectories to scalar rewards, forcing the policy to discover reusable tool-use patterns from scratch on every new task; memory-based alternatives retain past experience, yet they rely on test-time retrieval, without updating the policy to absorb reusable patterns from that experience. Our key insight is that multimodal reasoning trajectories should be distilled into reusable skills that co-evolve with the policy during training, rather than being consumed as rewards or retrieved from a static store. To this end, we propose SPyCE (Skill-Policy Co-evolution), a framework that distills trajectories into a hierarchical skill library and updates it throughout reinforcement learning. Execution skills capture local visual operations, while workflow skills encode high-level priors that orchestrate tool use. During training, the policy model conditions on retrieved skills to guide its rollouts, while the skill library evolves using valuable rollouts generated by the policy. This creates a closed loop in which improved policies yield better skills, and the evolving skill library, in turn, provides stronger priors for policy rollouts. Experiments across eight benchmarks demonstrate that SPyCE consistently outperforms both RL-based and memory-based baselines. Further analysis reveals that both the hierarchical skill design and the co-evolution mechanism are critical to our design. These results suggest joint skill-policy optimization as a promising paradigm for building capable multimodal agents.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Multimodal agents that think with images iteratively manipulate visual evidence and invoke tools across many steps.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.