Human Feedback Types
partialPairwise Preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Haolan Wang, Zhenghao Liu, Xinze Li, Xiaocui Yang +6 more
Published
Feb 24, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
40/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Feb 15, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
Background context only.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information. Recent methods employ Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to address table-related tasks across various modalities of table representations. However, existing studies mainly focus on exploring the table understanding ability of MLLMs using unimodal representations, which limits further exploration of multi-modal representations to enable more effective table reasoning. To better capture structural semantics from the tabular data, this paper introduces the HybrId-modal Preference oPtimizatiOn (HIPPO) model, which represents tables using both text and image, optimizing MLLMs by learning more comprehensive table information from these multiple modalities. Specifically, HIPPO samples MLLM responses from hybrid-modal table representations and designs a modality-consistent sampling strategy to enhance response diversity and mitigate modality bias during Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training. Experiments on table question answering and table fact verification tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of HIPPO, achieving a 4% improvement over various table reasoning models. Further analysis reveals that HIPPO not only enhances the table reasoning capability based on unimodal representations but also facilitates the extraction of complementary semantics across modalities. The code is available at https://github.com/NEUIR/HIPPO.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Pairwise Preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Tabular data contains rich structural semantics and plays a crucial role in organizing and manipulating information.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Pairwise Preference
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.