Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Slow-Fast Inference: Training-Free Inference Acceleration via Within-Sentence Support Stability

Xingyu Xie, Zhaochen Yu, Yue Liao, Tao Wang, Kim-Chuan Toh, Shuicheng Yan · Mar 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 12, 2026, 3:14 PM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 12, 2026, 3:14 PM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history. We observe a consistent pattern during decoding: within a sentence, and more generally within a short semantically coherent span, the dominant attention support often remains largely stable. Motivated by this observation, we propose Slow-Fast Inference (SFI), a training-free decoding framework that decouples generation into frequent low-cost fast steps and occasional dense-attention slow steps. Fast steps reuse a compact sparse memory for efficient decoding. Slow steps are triggered near semantic boundaries. At slow steps, the model revisits the broader context and uses the Selector to refresh the selected memory for subsequent fast steps. Across the evaluated context lengths, SFI delivers approximately $1.6\times$--$14.4\times$ higher decoding throughput while generally maintaining quality on par with the full-KV baseline across long-context and long-CoT settings. Because SFI is training-free and applies directly to existing checkpoints, it offers a practical path to reducing inference cost for contemporary autoregressive reasoning models in long-context, long-horizon, and agentic workloads.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Long Horizon tasks

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Long-horizon tasks
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.

Generated Mar 12, 2026, 3:14 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Long-context autoregressive decoding remains expensive because each decoding step must repeatedly process a growing history.
  • We observe a consistent pattern during decoding: within a sentence, and more generally within a short semantically coherent span, the dominant attention support often remains largely stable.
  • Motivated by this observation, we propose Slow-Fast Inference (SFI), a training-free decoding framework that decouples generation into frequent low-cost fast steps and occasional dense-attention slow steps.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.