Skip to content
← Back to explorer

SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructions

Ashima Suvarna, Kendrick Phan, Mehrab Beikzadeh, Hritik Bansal, Saadia Gabriel · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Recent

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Recent

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Recent

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code. Despite these advancements, LLMs still struggle with general reasoning tasks requiring capabilities such as causal inference and temporal understanding. Extending RLVR to general reasoning is fundamentally constrained by the lack of high-quality, verifiable training data that spans diverse reasoning skills. To address this challenge, we propose SUPERNOVA, a data curation framework for RLVR aimed at enhancing general reasoning. Our key insight is that instruction-tuning datasets containing expert-annotated ground-truth encode rich reasoning patterns that can be systematically adapted for RLVR. To study this, we conduct 100+ controlled RL experiments to analyze how data design choices impact downstream reasoning performance. In particular, we investigate three key factors: (i) source task selection, (ii) task mixing strategies, and (iii) synthetic interventions for improving data quality. Our analysis reveals that source task selection is non-trivial and has a significant impact on downstream reasoning performance. Moreover, selecting tasks based on their performance for individual target tasks outperforms strategies based on overall average performance. Finally, models trained on SUPERNOVA outperform strong baselines (e.g., Qwen3.5) on challenging reasoning benchmarks including BBEH, Zebralogic, and MMLU-Pro. In particular, training on SUPERNOVA yields relative improvements of up to 52.8\% on BBEH across model sizes, demonstrating the effectiveness of principled data curation for RLVR. Our findings provide practical insights for curating human-annotated resources to extend RLVR to general reasoning. The code and data is available at https://github.com/asuvarna31/supernova.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

Expert verification

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

Evidence snippet: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

MMLU

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

Evidence snippet: Finally, models trained on SUPERNOVA outperform strong baselines (e.g., Qwen3.5) on challenging reasoning benchmarks including BBEH, Zebralogic, and MMLU-Pro.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Our key insight is that instruction-tuning datasets containing expert-annotated ground-truth encode rich reasoning patterns that can be systematically adapted for RLVR.

Human Data Lens

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: MMLU
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved large language model (LLM) reasoning in formal domains such as mathematics and code.
  • Despite these advancements, LLMs still struggle with general reasoning tasks requiring capabilities such as causal inference and temporal understanding.
  • Extending RLVR to general reasoning is fundamentally constrained by the lack of high-quality, verifiable training data that spans diverse reasoning skills.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against others mentioning MMLU.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.