Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

EdgeRock: Strong Reasoning at Constant Memory

Huishan Ji, Weiming Zhang, Qirui Ye, Jinchao Xu +2 more

Published

Oct 7, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

5/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Oct 16, 2026

Open arXiv Find implementation Shortlist (0) RSS feed

Tags

Automatic Metrics

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
5/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here

Human Eval Papers LLM-as-Judge Papers Pairwise Preference Papers Tool-Use Evaluation Search

Abstract

We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory. Most models keep reasoning history in a key-value (KV) cache that grows with every token, consuming accelerator memory, limiting concurrent requests, and competing with perception and control on edge devices. With fixed history, memory is allocated once and never runs out, however long the model reasons. Constant memory alone is not new: bounded-state models (recurrent, state-space, and sliding-window) already achieve it, but often at the cost of reasoning, because they cannot keep the distant details that later reasoning needs. We therefore introduce Rock Memory Anchors (RMA): the model learns what is worth remembering and stores it as KV records in a fixed-size bank, directly readable however far back the source lies. EdgeRock-4B, our first open-source release, supports text and image reasoning and reaches 82.9% mean pass@1 on AIME 2024-2026, while the bounded-state models we evaluate reach at most 18.8%, even at 14B scale. This result is on par with leading compact models whose memory grows with reasoning. Compared with its source model, EdgeRock-4B uses up to 99.1% less KV cache and delivers up to 6.42$\times$ higher end-to-end batch throughput.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

AIME

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"EdgeRock-4B, our first open-source release, supports text and image reasoning and reaches 82.9% mean pass@1 on AIME 2024-2026, while the bounded-state models we evaluate reach at most 18.8%, even at 14B scale."

Reported Metrics

partial

Pass@1

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"EdgeRock-4B, our first open-source release, supports text and image reasoning and reaches 82.9% mean pass@1 on AIME 2024-2026, while the bounded-state models we evaluate reach at most 18.8%, even at 14B scale."

Benchmarks and datasets

AIME

Reported metrics

pass@1
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Expertise required
General
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory.
  • Most models keep reasoning history in a key-value (KV) cache that grows with every token, consuming accelerator memory, limiting concurrent requests, and competing with perception and control on edge devices.
  • With fixed history, memory is allocated once and never runs out, however long the model reasons.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • We present EdgeRock, a family of multimodal models that deliver strong reasoning at constant memory.
  • EdgeRock-4B, our first open-source release, supports text and image reasoning and reaches 82.9% mean pass@1 on AIME 2024-2026, while the bounded-state models we evaluate reach at most 18.8%, even at 14B scale.
  • Compared with its source model, EdgeRock-4B uses up to 99.1% less KV cache and delivers up to 6.42\times higher end-to-end batch throughput.

Why it matters for eval

  • Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: AIME

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: pass@1