Language Agents for Hypothesis-driven Clinical Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning
David Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini, Ege Özsoy, Nassir Navab, Matthias Keicher · Jun 16, 2025 · Citations: 0
Data freshness
Extraction: FreshCheck recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.
Metadata refreshed
Feb 28, 2026, 5:31 PM
RecentExtraction refreshed
Mar 8, 2026, 7:00 AM
FreshExtraction source
Runtime deterministic fallback
Confidence 0.45
Abstract
Clinical decision-making is a dynamic, interactive, and cyclic process where doctors have to repeatedly decide on which clinical action to perform and consider newly uncovered information for diagnosis and treatment. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to support clinicians in this process, however, most applications of LLMs in clinical decision support suffer from one of two limitations: Either they assume the unrealistic scenario of immediate availability of all patient information and do not model the interactive and iterative investigation process, or they restrict themselves to the limited "out-of-the-box" capabilities of large pre-trained models without performing task-specific training. In contrast to this, we propose to model clinical decision-making for diagnosis with a hypothesis-driven uncertainty-aware language agent, LA-CDM, that converges towards a diagnosis via repeatedly requesting and interpreting relevant tests. Using a hybrid training paradigm combining supervised and reinforcement learning, we train LA-CDM with three objectives targeting critical aspects of clinical decision-making: accurate hypothesis generation, hypothesis uncertainty estimation, and efficient decision-making. We evaluate our methodology on MIMIC-CDM, a real-world dataset covering four abdominal diseases containing various clinical tests and show the benefit of explicitly training clinical decision-making for increasing diagnostic performance and efficiency.