Ouroboros: Dynamic Weight Generation for Recursive Transformers via Input-Conditioned LoRA Modulation

Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber · Apr 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Recursive transformers reuse a shared weight block across multiple depth steps, trading parameters for compute. A core limitation: every step applies the same transformation, preventing the model from composing distinct operations across depth. We present Ouroboros, a system that attaches a compact Controller hypernetwork to a recursive transformer block. The Controller observes the current hidden state, produces a per-step diagonal modulation vector, and applies it to frozen SVD-initialized LoRA bases, making each recurrence step input-dependent. We combine this with gated recurrence (bias-initialized to 88% retention) and per-step LayerNorm for stable deep iteration. On Qwen2.5-3B split into a Prelude/Recurrent/Coda architecture (17 of 36 layers retained), Ouroboros reduces training loss by 43.4% over the unmodified 17-layer baseline, recovering 51.3% of the performance gap caused by layer removal. The full system adds only 9.2M trainable parameters (Controller, gate, and per-step norms) yet outperforms equivalently-sized static per-step LoRA by 1.44 loss points at depth 1 and remains ahead across all tested depths (1, 4, 8, 16) and ranks (8, 32, 64). We also find that gated recurrence is essential: without it, recursive layer application makes the model strictly worse. These gains are measured on the training distribution; on held-out text, the Controller does not yet improve over the baseline, a limitation we attribute to frozen downstream layers and discuss in detail. Code: https://github.com/RightNow-AI/ouroboros

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.