Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Learning Faster with Better Tokens: Parameter-Efficient Vocabulary Adaptation for Specialized Text Summarization

Gunjan Balde, Soumyadeep Roy, Mainack Mondal, Niloy Ganguly · May 17, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains. Although continual pretraining for domain adaptation partially alleviate performance degradation, it does not resolve the fundamental vocabulary mismatch. To address this gap, we introduce a targeted parameter-efficient domain adaptation approach that combines vocabulary adaptation with pretraining for LLM-based text summarization. Our unified framework augments pretrained tokenizers with domain-specific tokens while selectively replacing under-trained and unreachable tokens to limit parameter growth. We evaluate our approach on Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B across legal and medical summarization tasks on a challenge-oriented evaluation protocol focused on expert-driven text and summaries which typically has higher concentration of over-fragmented Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) words. The vocabulary adaptation algorithm enhances the overall quality of the summarization model by improving semantic similarity between the generated summaries and their references. In addition, the adapted model produces summaries that incorporate more appropriate novel and domain-specific words, leading to improved coherence, relevance, and faithfulness. We further observe that our proposed approach significantly reduce training time by $35-55\%$ over continual pretraining and reduce parameter counts up to $37\%$ w.r.t expansion-only methods. We make the codebase publicly available at https://github.com/gb-kgp/VocabReplace-Then-Expand.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

Expert verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"We evaluate our approach on Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B across legal and medical summarization tasks on a challenge-oriented evaluation protocol focused on expert-driven text and summaries which typically has higher concentration of over-fragmented Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) words."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains.
  • Although continual pretraining for domain adaptation partially alleviate performance degradation, it does not resolve the fundamental vocabulary mismatch.
  • To address this gap, we introduce a targeted parameter-efficient domain adaptation approach that combines vocabulary adaptation with pretraining for LLM-based text summarization.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.