Skip to content
← Back to explorer

KDFlow: A User-Friendly and Efficient Knowledge Distillation Framework for Large Language Models

Songming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Tong Zhang, Bojie Hu, Yufeng Chen, Jinan Xu · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Fresh

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 2, 2026, 1:54 PM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Mar 8, 2026, 5:36 AM

Fresh

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence 0.20

Abstract

Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones. However, despite the distinct roles of the student model and the teacher model in KD, most existing frameworks still use a homogeneous training backend (e.g., FSDP and DeepSpeed) for both models, leading to suboptimal training efficiency. In this paper, we present a novel framework for LLM distillation, termed \textbf{KDFlow}, which features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference. By bridging the training efficiency of FSDP2 and the inference efficiency of SGLang, KDFlow achieves full utilization of both advantages in a unified system. Moreover, instead of transferring full logits across different processes, our framework only transmits the teacher's hidden states using zero-copy data transfer and recomputes the logits on the student side, effectively balancing the communication cost and KD performance. Furthermore, our framework supports both off-policy and on-policy distillation and incorporates KD algorithms for cross-tokenizer KD through highly extensible and user-friendly APIs. Experiments show that KDFlow can achieve \textbf{1.44$\times$ to 6.36$\times$} speedup compared to current KD frameworks, enabling researchers to rapidly prototype and scale LLM distillation with minimal engineering overhead. Code is available at: https://github.com/songmzhang/KDFlow

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.
  • Extraction confidence is 0.20 (below strong-reference threshold).
  • No explicit evaluation mode was extracted from available metadata.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Trust level

Low

Eval-Fit Score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones.

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones.

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones.

Reported Metrics

partial

Cost

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction evidenced

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Moreover, instead of transferring full logits across different processes, our framework only transmits the teacher's hidden states using zero-copy data transfer and recomputes the logits on the student side, effectively balancing the communication cost and KD performance.

Rater Population

missing

Unknown

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones.

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Unknown
  • Unit of annotation: Unknown
  • Expertise required: Coding
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.20
  • Flags: low_signal, possible_false_positive

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

cost

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

In this paper, we present a novel framework for LLM distillation, termed KDFlow, which features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference. HFEPX protocol signal is limited in abstract-level metadata, so treat it as adjacent context. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Mar 8, 2026, 5:36 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • In this paper, we present a novel framework for LLM distillation, termed KDFlow, which features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference.
  • Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.

Researcher Actions

  • Treat this as method context, then pivot to protocol-specific HFEPX hubs.
  • Identify benchmark choices from full text before operationalizing conclusions.
  • Validate metric comparability (cost).

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Low-signal flag detected: protocol relevance may be indirect.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this paper, we present a novel framework for LLM distillation, termed KDFlow, which features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: cost

Category-Adjacent Papers (Broader Context)

These papers are nearby in arXiv category and useful for broader context, but not necessarily protocol-matched to this paper.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.