Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Vero: An Open RL Recipe for General Visual Reasoning

Gabriel Sarch, Linrong Cai, Qunzhong Wang, Haoyang Wu, Danqi Chen, Zhuang Liu · Apr 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks? The strongest vision-language models (VLMs) show such broad visual reasoning is within reach, but the recipe behind them remains unclear, locked behind proprietary reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines with non-public data. We introduce Vero, a family of fully open VLMs that matches or exceeds existing open-weight models across diverse visual reasoning tasks. We scale RL data and rewards across six broad task categories, constructing Vero-600K, a 600K-sample dataset from 59 datasets, and designing task-routed rewards that handle heterogeneous answer formats. Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.6-5.3 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks. Starting from Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Vero outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking on 23 of 30 benchmarks without additional proprietary thinking data. When trained from the same base model, Vero-600K exceeds existing RL datasets across task categories. Systematic ablations reveal that different task categories elicit qualitatively distinct reasoning patterns that transfer poorly in isolation, suggesting that broad data coverage is the primary driver of strong RL scaling. All data, code, and models are released.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 25%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?"

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?"

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?"

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

Veroeval

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.6-5.3 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?"

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Veroeval

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?
  • The strongest vision-language models (VLMs) show such broad visual reasoning is within reach, but the recipe behind them remains unclear, locked behind proprietary reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines with non-public data.
  • We introduce Vero, a family of fully open VLMs that matches or exceeds existing open-weight models across diverse visual reasoning tasks.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We introduce Vero, a family of fully open VLMs that matches or exceeds existing open-weight models across diverse visual reasoning tasks.
  • Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.6-5.3 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks.
  • Starting from Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Vero outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking on 23 of 30 benchmarks without additional proprietary thinking data.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.6-5.3 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks.
  • Starting from Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Vero outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking on 23 of 30 benchmarks without additional proprietary thinking data.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Veroeval

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.