Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Scalable Neural Decoders for Practical Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

Andi Gu, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Mikhail D. Lukin, Susanne F. Yelin · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing. However, it requires classical decoders that are fast and accurate enough to keep pace with quantum hardware. While quantum low-density parity-check codes have recently emerged as a promising route to efficient fault tolerance, current decoding algorithms do not allow one to realize the full potential of these codes in practical settings. Here, we introduce a convolutional neural network decoder that exploits the geometric structure of QEC codes, and use it to probe a novel "waterfall" regime of error suppression, demonstrating that the logical error rates required for large-scale fault-tolerant algorithms are attainable with modest code sizes at current physical error rates, and with latencies within the real-time budgets of several leading hardware platforms. For example, for the $[144, 12, 12]$ Gross code, the decoder achieves logical error rates up to $\sim 17$x below existing decoders - reaching logical error rates $\sim 10^{-10}$ at physical error $p=0.1\%$ - with 3-5 orders of magnitude higher throughput. This decoder also produces well-calibrated confidence estimates that can significantly reduce the time overhead of repeat-until-success protocols. Taken together, these results suggest that the space-time costs associated with fault-tolerant quantum computation may be significantly lower than previously anticipated.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.
  • However, it requires classical decoders that are fast and accurate enough to keep pace with quantum hardware.
  • While quantum low-density parity-check codes have recently emerged as a promising route to efficient fault tolerance, current decoding algorithms do not allow one to realize the full potential of these codes in practical settings.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.