Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Scalable Neural Decoders for Practical Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

Andi Gu, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Mikhail D. Lukin, Susanne F. Yelin · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Recent

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Apr 9, 2026, 3:21 PM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Apr 9, 2026, 3:21 PM

Recent

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing. However, it requires classical decoders that are fast and accurate enough to keep pace with quantum hardware. While quantum low-density parity-check codes have recently emerged as a promising route to efficient fault tolerance, current decoding algorithms do not allow one to realize the full potential of these codes in practical settings. Here, we introduce a convolutional neural network decoder that exploits the geometric structure of QEC codes, and use it to probe a novel "waterfall" regime of error suppression, demonstrating that the logical error rates required for large-scale fault-tolerant algorithms are attainable with modest code sizes at current physical error rates, and with latencies within the real-time budgets of several leading hardware platforms. For example, for the $[144, 12, 12]$ Gross code, the decoder achieves logical error rates up to $\sim 17$x below existing decoders - reaching logical error rates $\sim 10^{-10}$ at physical error $p=0.1\%$ - with 3-5 orders of magnitude higher throughput. This decoder also produces well-calibrated confidence estimates that can significantly reduce the time overhead of repeat-until-success protocols. Taken together, these results suggest that the space-time costs associated with fault-tolerant quantum computation may be significantly lower than previously anticipated.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.

Generated Apr 9, 2026, 3:21 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for scalable quantum computing.
  • However, it requires classical decoders that are fast and accurate enough to keep pace with quantum hardware.
  • While quantum low-density parity-check codes have recently emerged as a promising route to efficient fault tolerance, current decoding algorithms do not allow one to realize the full potential of these codes in practical settings.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.