Skip to content
← Back to explorer

From Manipulation to Mistrust: Explaining Diverse Micro-Video Misinformation for Robust Debunking in the Wild

Zhi Zeng, Yifei Yang, Jiaying Wu, Xulang Zhang, Xiangzheng Kong, Herun Wan, Zihan Ma, Minnan Luo · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust. Existing benchmarks typically focus on a single deception type, overlooking the diversity of real-world cases that involve multimodal manipulation, AI-generated content, cognitive bias, and out-of-context reuse. Meanwhile, most detection models lack fine-grained attribution, limiting interpretability and practical utility. To address these gaps, we introduce WildFakeBench, a large-scale benchmark of over 10,000 real-world micro-videos covering diverse misinformation types and sources, each annotated with expert-defined attribution labels. Building on this foundation, we develop FakeAgent, a Delphi-inspired multi-agent reasoning framework that integrates multimodal understanding with external evidence for attribution-grounded analysis. FakeAgent jointly analyzes content and retrieved evidence to identify manipulation, recognize cognitive and AI-generated patterns, and detect out-of-context misinformation. Extensive experiments show that FakeAgent consistently outperforms existing MLLMs across all misinformation types, while WildFakeBench provides a realistic and challenging testbed for advancing explainable micro-video misinformation detection. Data and code are available at: https://github.com/Aiyistan/FakeAgent.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

Expert verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"To address these gaps, we introduce WildFakeBench, a large-scale benchmark of over 10,000 real-world micro-videos covering diverse misinformation types and sources, each annotated with expert-defined attribution labels."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: Expert verification
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • The rise of micro-videos has reshaped how misinformation spreads, amplifying its speed, reach, and impact on public trust.
  • Existing benchmarks typically focus on a single deception type, overlooking the diversity of real-world cases that involve multimodal manipulation, AI-generated content, cognitive bias, and out-of-context reuse.
  • Meanwhile, most detection models lack fine-grained attribution, limiting interpretability and practical utility.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.