Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Graph2Eval: Automatic Multimodal Task Generation for Agents via Knowledge Graphs

Yurun Chen, Xavier Hu, Yuhan Liu, Ziqi Wang, Zeyi Liao, Lin Chen, Feng Wei, Yuxi Qian, Bo Zheng, Keting Yin, Shengyu Zhang · Oct 1, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Stale

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Stale

Trust level

Low

Signals: Stale

What still needs checking

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Signal confidence: 0.25

Abstract

As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks. Existing studies have attempted to generate agent tasks using LLMs, but due to the inherent hallucinations of LLMs and the lack of internal data relationship modeling, these tasks often exhibit semantic inconsistencies and solvability issues. To address these challenges, we introduce Graph2Eval, a knowledge-graph-driven framework for automated, scalable, and semantically grounded agent task generation. At its core, Graph2Eval leverages a knowledge graph built from heterogeneous external data sources as a structured task space, generating multimodal agent tasks through subgraph sampling and task construction guided by task templates and meta-path strategies. To further ensure task reliability, a multi-stage filtering pipeline based on node reachability analysis, LLM scoring, and similarity analysis ensures the diversity and solvability of the generated tasks. By unifying both RAG Agent and Web Agent scenarios, Graph2Eval enables efficient generation of multimodal document understanding tasks and multi-step web interaction tasks. We instantiate the framework with Graph2Eval-Bench, a curated dataset of 1,319 tasks spanning document understanding and web interaction scenarios. Extensive experiments show that, on average, Graph2Eval improves task semantic consistency by 20% and solvability by 17% over baselines, while Graph2Eval-Bench effectively distinguishes agent performance, offering a new perspective on agent evaluation.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.
  • Extraction confidence is 0.25 (below strong-reference threshold).

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Trust level

Low

Eval-Fit Score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Not found

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Not found

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Not found

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

Graph2eval, Graph2eval Bench

Confidence: Low Direct evidence

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

Evidence snippet: To address these challenges, we introduce Graph2Eval, a knowledge-graph-driven framework for automated, scalable, and semantically grounded agent task generation.

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Not found

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Rater Population

missing

Unknown

Confidence: Low Not found

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Unknown
  • Unit of annotation: Unknown
  • Expertise required: General
  • Signal basis: Structured extraction plus abstract evidence.

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Signal confidence: 0.25
  • Known cautions: low_signal, possible_false_positive

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Graph2evalGraph2eval-Bench

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.
  • Existing studies have attempted to generate agent tasks using LLMs, but due to the inherent hallucinations of LLMs and the lack of internal data relationship modeling, these tasks often exhibit semantic inconsistencies and solvability issues.
  • To address these challenges, we introduce Graph2Eval, a knowledge-graph-driven framework for automated, scalable, and semantically grounded agent task generation.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • As multimodal LLM-driven agents advance in autonomy and generalization, traditional static datasets face inherent scalability limitations and are insufficient for fully assessing their capabilities in increasingly complex and diverse tasks.
  • To address these challenges, we introduce Graph2Eval, a knowledge-graph-driven framework for automated, scalable, and semantically grounded agent task generation.
  • Extensive experiments show that, on average, Graph2Eval improves task semantic consistency by 20% and solvability by 17% over baselines, while Graph2Eval-Bench effectively distinguishes agent performance, offering a new perspective on agent…

Why It Matters For Eval

  • To address these challenges, we introduce Graph2Eval, a knowledge-graph-driven framework for automated, scalable, and semantically grounded agent task generation.
  • Extensive experiments show that, on average, Graph2Eval improves task semantic consistency by 20% and solvability by 17% over baselines, while Graph2Eval-Bench effectively distinguishes agent performance, offering a new perspective on agent…

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Graph2eval, Graph2eval-Bench

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.