Skip to content
← Back to explorer

The logic of KM belief update is contained in the logic of AGM belief revision

Giacomo Bonanno · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Abstract

For each axiom of KM belief update we provide a corresponding axiom in a modal logic containing three modal operators: a unimodal belief operator $B$, a bimodal conditional operator $>$ and the unimodal necessity operator $\square$. We then compare the resulting logic to the similar logic obtained from converting the AGM axioms of belief revision into modal axioms and show that the latter contains the former. Denoting the latter by $\mathcal L_{AGM}$ and the former by $\mathcal L_{KM}$ we show that every axiom of $\mathcal L_{KM}$ is a theorem of $\mathcal L_{AGM}$. Thus AGM belief revision can be seen as a special case of KM belief update. For the strong version of KM belief update we show that the difference between $\mathcal L_{KM}$ and $\mathcal L_{AGM}$ can be narrowed down to a single axiom, which deals exclusively with unsurprising information, that is, with formulas that were not initially disbelieved.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper has direct human-feedback and/or evaluation protocol signal and is likely useful for eval pipeline design.

Eval-Fit Score

40/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

High-confidence candidate

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Critique Edit
  • Rater population: Unknown
  • Unit of annotation: Unknown
  • Expertise required: Math
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.45
  • Flags: ambiguous

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Denoting the latter by \mathcal L_{AGM} and the former by \mathcal L_{KM} we show that every axiom of \mathcal L_{KM} is a theorem of \mathcal L_{AGM}. HFEPX signals include Critique Edit with confidence 0.45. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Mar 3, 2026, 6:49 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Denoting the latter by \mathcal L_{AGM} and the former by \mathcal L_{KM} we show that every axiom of \mathcal L_{KM} is a theorem of \mathcal L_{AGM}.
  • For the strong version of KM belief update we show that the difference between \mathcal L_{KM} and \mathcal L_{AGM} can be narrowed down to a single axiom, which deals exclusively…
  • Primary extracted protocol signals: Critique Edit.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare its human-feedback setup against pairwise and rubric hubs.
  • Identify benchmark choices from full text before operationalizing conclusions.
  • Verify metric definitions before comparing against your eval pipeline.

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Extraction confidence is probabilistic and should be validated for critical decisions.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Denoting the latter by \mathcal L_{AGM} and the former by \mathcal L_{KM} we show that every axiom of \mathcal L_{KM} is a theorem of \mathcal L_{AGM}.
  • For the strong version of KM belief update we show that the difference between \mathcal L_{KM} and \mathcal L_{AGM} can be narrowed down to a single axiom, which deals exclusively with unsurprising information, that is, with formulas that…

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Critique Edit

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.