Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)Pairwise preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Xilai Ma, Liye Zhao, Weijun Yao, Haibing Di +2 more
Published
May 11, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
May 11, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences. Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences. We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals. By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users' data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences. To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory. This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting ``positive bias'', ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness. Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Pairwise preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.