Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Yuanxin Liu, Ruida Zhou, Xinyan Zhao, Amr Sharaf +5 more
Published
Jun 17, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
Jun 17, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. However, standard post-training methods primarily optimize single-shot objectives, creating a fundamental misalignment with multi-step inference dynamics. While recent work treats this as multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL), conventional approaches optimize over the multi-step trajectories directly, failing to further exploit the high-quality mistakes in intermediate steps that model can learn from correcting them. We propose a two-stage iterative framework that alternates between online data/prompt augmentation and policy optimization. By converting the intermediate steps (``near-miss'' answers) in the successful recovery trajectories into decoupled revision and verification prompts, our approach concentrates training on both effective answer transformation and error identification. This approach enables efficient off-policy data generation and reduces the computational overhead of long-horizon sampling compared to standard multi-turn RL. On LiveCodeBench, using publicly available test cases as feedback, we observe gains of +6.5 points over the RL baseline and +4.0 points over standard multi-turn training. Beyond coding, our approach matches the previously reported SOTA result on circle packing while using the smallest base model (4B) and far fewer rollouts than the much larger evolutionary search systems. Math results under ground-truth verification further confirm improved correction ability. It also generalizes to out-of-distribution constraint-satisfaction puzzles such as n\_queens and mini\_sudoku, where correctness is defined entirely by problem constraints. Code is available at https://github.com/yxliu02/REVES.git.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
Long Horizon tasks
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
LiveCodeBench
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"On LiveCodeBench, using publicly available test cases as feedback, we observe gains of +6.5 points over the RL baseline and +4.0 points over standard multi-turn training."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.