Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Action Without Interaction: Probing the Physical Foundations of Video LMMs via Contact-Release Detection

Daniel Harari, Michael Sidorov, Chen Shterental, Liel David, Abrham Kahsay Gebreselasie, Muhammad Haris Khan · Nov 25, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Recent

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Recent

Trust level

Low

Signals: Recent

What still needs checking

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Signal confidence: 0.15

Abstract

Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos. For example, given a video sequence, such models are able to describe in detail objects, the surroundings and dynamic actions. In this study, we explored the extent to which these models ground their semantic understanding in the actual visual input. Specifically, given sequences of hands interacting with objects, we asked models when and where the interaction begins or ends. For this purpose, we introduce a first of its kind, large-scale dataset with more than 20K annotated interactions on videos from the Something-Something-V2 dataset. 250 AMTurk human annotators labeled core interaction events, particularly when and where objects and agents become attached (`contact') or detached (`release'). We asked SoTA LMMs, including GPT, Gemini and Qwen to locate these events in short videos, each with a single event. The results show that while models reliably name target objects and identify actions, they exhibit a form of `shortcut learning' where semantic success masks a failure in physical grounding. Specifically, they consistently fail to identify the frame where the interaction begins or ends and poorly localize the physical event within the scene. This disconnect suggests that while LMMs excel at System 1 intuitive pattern recognition (naming the action and objects), they lack the System 2 cognitive foundations required to reason about physical primitives like `contact' and `release', hence truly ground dynamic scenes in physical reality.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.
  • Extraction confidence is 0.15 (below strong-reference threshold).
  • No explicit evaluation mode was extracted from available metadata.
  • No benchmark/dataset or metric anchors were extracted.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Trust level

Low

Eval-Fit Score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Not found

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Not found

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Not found

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Not found

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Not found

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Rater Population

partial

Crowd

Confidence: Low Direct evidence

Helpful for staffing comparability.

Evidence snippet: 250 AMTurk human annotators labeled core interaction events, particularly when and where objects and agents become attached (`contact') or detached (`release').

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Crowd
  • Unit of annotation: Unknown
  • Expertise required: General
  • Signal basis: Structured extraction plus abstract evidence.

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Signal confidence: 0.15
  • Known cautions: low_signal, possible_false_positive

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large multi-modal models (LMMs) show increasing performance in realistic visual tasks for images and, more recently, for videos.
  • For example, given a video sequence, such models are able to describe in detail objects, the surroundings and dynamic actions.
  • In this study, we explored the extent to which these models ground their semantic understanding in the actual visual input.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • For this purpose, we introduce a first of its kind, large-scale dataset with more than 20K annotated interactions on videos from the Something-Something-V2 dataset.
  • 250 AMTurk human annotators labeled core interaction events, particularly when and where objects and agents become attached (`contact') or detached (`release').

Why It Matters For Eval

  • 250 AMTurk human annotators labeled core interaction events, particularly when and where objects and agents become attached (`contact') or detached (`release').

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.