Skip to content
← Back to explorer

ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compression

Xiaojie Ke, Shuai Zhang, Liansheng Sun, Yongjin Wang, Hengjun Jiang, Xiangkun Liu, Cunxin Gu, Jian Xu, Guanjun Jiang · Apr 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval. However, its reliance on feeding full passage texts into the LLM introduces two critical bottlenecks: the "lost in the middle" phenomenon degrades ranking quality as input length grows, and the inference latency scales super-linearly with sequence length, rendering it impractical for industrial deployment. In this paper, we present ResRank, a unified retrieval-reranking framework that fundamentally addresses both challenges. Inspired by multimodal LLMs that project visual inputs into compact token representations, ResRank employs an Encoder-LLM to compress each candidate passage into a single embedding, which is then fed alongside the query text into a Reranker-LLM for listwise ranking. To alleviate the misalignment between the compressed representation space and the ranking space, we introduce a residual connection structure that combines encoder embeddings with contextualized hidden states from the reranker. Furthermore, we replace the conventional autoregressive decoding with a one-step cosine-similarity-based scoring mechanism, eliminating the generation bottleneck entirely. ResRank is trained through a carefully designed dual-stage, multi-task, end-to-end joint optimization strategy that simultaneously trains the encoder and reranker, achieving learning objective alignment between retrieval and reranking while substantially reducing training complexity. Extensive experiments on TREC Deep Learning and eight BEIR benchmark datasets demonstrate that ResRank achieves competitive or superior ranking effectiveness compared to existing approaches while requiring zero generated tokens and processing only one token per passage, yielding a fundamentally better balance between effectiveness and efficiency.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

5/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 45%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

BEIR, TREC

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Extensive experiments on TREC Deep Learning and eight BEIR benchmark datasets demonstrate that ResRank achieves competitive or superior ranking effectiveness compared to existing approaches while requiring zero generated tokens and processing only one token per passage, yielding a fundamentally better balance between effectiveness and efficiency."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Unit of annotation: Ranking (inferred)
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

BEIRTREC

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large language model (LLM) based listwise reranking has emerged as the dominant paradigm for achieving state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness in information retrieval.
  • However, its reliance on feeding full passage texts into the LLM introduces two critical bottlenecks: the "lost in the middle" phenomenon degrades ranking quality as input length grows, and the inference latency scales super-linearly with sequence length, rendering it impractical for industrial deployment.
  • In this paper, we present ResRank, a unified retrieval-reranking framework that fundamentally addresses both challenges.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this paper, we present ResRank, a unified retrieval-reranking framework that fundamentally addresses both challenges.
  • To alleviate the misalignment between the compressed representation space and the ranking space, we introduce a residual connection structure that combines encoder embeddings with contextualized hidden states from the reranker.
  • Extensive experiments on TREC Deep Learning and eight BEIR benchmark datasets demonstrate that ResRank achieves competitive or superior ranking effectiveness compared to existing approaches while requiring zero generated tokens and…

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Extensive experiments on TREC Deep Learning and eight BEIR benchmark datasets demonstrate that ResRank achieves competitive or superior ranking effectiveness compared to existing approaches while requiring zero generated tokens and…

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: BEIR, TREC

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.