Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

Sumi: Open Uniform Diffusion Language Model from Scratch

Mengyu Ye, Keito Kudo, Wataru Ikeda, Ryosuke Matsuda +2 more

Published

Jun 17, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Extraction confidence

0% (Provisional)

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Signals refreshed

Jun 17, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Weak or implicit
Validate from full paper
Usefulness for eval research
Unavailable
Provisional (processing)

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Abstract

Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models. Among these, uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) permit any token to be updated at any step, in principle enabling more flexible generation. However, no UDLM has yet been pretrained from scratch at both large parameter scale and large token budget. Both autoregressive modeling and masked diffusion modeling already have capable models at scale that the community can study and build on; uniform diffusion has none. A scratch-pretrained UDLM at scale would provide a clean reference point for studying scaling behavior, generation dynamics, controllability, and trade-offs against established autoregressive and masked diffusion models. To this end, we introduce Sumi ("ink" in Japanese), a fully open 7B uniform diffusion language model pretrained from scratch on 1.5T tokens. Sumi performs competitively with autoregressive models trained at comparable token budgets on knowledge, reasoning, and coding benchmarks, while under-performing on commonsense benchmarks, where our education-heavy data mixture is a likely contributor. We release our model weights, checkpoints, and full training recipe, including a complete specification of the data mixture over publicly available corpora. We hope this release enables the community to study native uniform diffusion at scale and catalyzes work on its as-yet poorly understood aspects.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models."

Human feedback details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.
Evaluation details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research brief

Metadata summary

Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models.
  • Among these, uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) permit any token to be updated at any step, in principle enabling more flexible generation.
  • However, no UDLM has yet been pretrained from scratch at both large parameter scale and large token budget.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries