Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Physics-Informed Evolution: An Evolutionary Framework for Solving Quantum Control Problems Involving the Schrödinger Equation

Kaichen Ouyang, Mingyang Yu, Zong Ke, Jun Zhang, Yi Chen, Huiling Chen · Feb 6, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions. Similar to optimizing loss functions in machine learning, evolutionary algorithms iteratively optimize objective functions by simulating natural selection processes. Inspired by this principle, we ask a natural question: can physical information be similarly embedded into the fitness function of evolutionary algorithms? In this work, we propose Physics-informed Evolution (PIE), a novel framework that incorporates physical information derived from governing physical laws into the evolutionary fitness landscape, thereby extending Physics-informed artificial intelligence methods from machine learning to the broader domain of evolutionary computation. As a concrete instantiation, we apply PIE to quantum control problems governed by the Schrödinger equation, where the goal is to find optimal control fields that drive quantum systems from initial states to desired target states. We validate PIE on three representative quantum control benchmarks: state preparation in V-type three-level systems, entangled state generation in superconducting quantum circuits, and two-atom cavity QED systems. Within the PIE framework, we systematically compare the performance of ten single-objective and five multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that by embedding physical information into the fitness function, PIE effectively guides evolutionary search, yielding control fields with high fidelity, low state deviation, and robust performance across different scenarios. Our findings further suggest that the Physics-informed principle extends naturally beyond neural network training to the broader domain of evolutionary computation.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
  • The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) show that embedding physical laws directly into the learning objective can significantly enhance the efficiency and physical consistency of neural network solutions.
  • Similar to optimizing loss functions in machine learning, evolutionary algorithms iteratively optimize objective functions by simulating natural selection processes.
  • Inspired by this principle, we ask a natural question: can physical information be similarly embedded into the fitness function of evolutionary algorithms?

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this work, we propose Physics-informed Evolution (PIE), a novel framework that incorporates physical information derived from governing physical laws into the evolutionary fitness landscape, thereby extending Physics-informed artificial…
  • We validate PIE on three representative quantum control benchmarks: state preparation in V-type three-level systems, entangled state generation in superconducting quantum circuits, and two-atom cavity QED systems.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • We validate PIE on three representative quantum control benchmarks: state preparation in V-type three-level systems, entangled state generation in superconducting quantum circuits, and two-atom cavity QED systems.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.