Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Guoqi Ma, Liang Zhang, Hongyao Tu, Hao Fu +5 more
Published
Apr 9, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Apr 20, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
Background context only.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents. Existing approaches typically adopt the paradigm of ``\textit{Small Language Model (SLM) + Classifier}''. However, the limited language understanding ability of SLMs hinders further improvement of their performance. In this paper, we conduct a preliminary study to explore the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in cross-document RE. Despite their extensive parameters, our findings indicate that LLMs do not consistently surpass existing SLMs. Further analysis suggests that the underperformance is largely attributed to the challenges posed by the numerous predefined relations. To overcome this issue, we propose an LLM-based \underline{H}ierarchical \underline{C}lassification model for cross-document \underline{RE} (HCRE), which consists of two core components: 1) an LLM for relation prediction and 2) a \textit{hierarchical relation tree} derived from the predefined relation set. This tree enables the LLM to perform hierarchical classification, where the target relation is inferred level by level. Since the number of child nodes is much smaller than the size of the entire predefined relation set, the hierarchical relation tree significantly reduces the number of relation options that LLM needs to consider during inference. However, hierarchical classification introduces the risk of error propagation across levels. To mitigate this, we propose a \textit{prediction-then-verification} inference strategy that improves prediction reliability through multi-view verification at each level. Extensive experiments show that HCRE outperforms existing baselines, validating its effectiveness.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.