Skip to content
← Back to explorer

GLM-OCR Technical Report

Shuaiqi Duan, Yadong Xue, Weihan Wang, Zhe Su, Huan Liu, Sheng Yang, Guobing Gan, Guo Wang, Zihan Wang, Shengdong Yan, Dexin Jin, Yuxuan Zhang, Guohong Wen, Yanfeng Wang, Yutao Zhang, Xiaohan Zhang, Wenyi Hong, Yukuo Cen, Da Yin, Bin Chen, Wenmeng Yu, Xiaotao Gu, Jie Tang · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 16, 2026, 1:48 PM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 16, 2026, 1:48 PM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding. It combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder with a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, achieving a strong balance between computational efficiency and recognition performance. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. At the system level, a two-stage pipeline is adopted: PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. Extensive evaluations on public benchmarks and industrial scenarios show that GLM-OCR achieves competitive or state-of-the-art performance in document parsing, text and formula transcription, table structure recovery, and key information extraction. Its compact architecture and structured generation make it suitable for both resource-constrained edge deployment and large-scale production systems.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.

Generated Mar 16, 2026, 1:48 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding.
  • It combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder with a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, achieving a strong balance between computational efficiency and recognition performance.
  • To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.